I am Kate’s raging offspring.
Mark brought it my attention today, that I botched my post yesterday.
“Why are we voting NO on 2?”
“what? No, we’re voting yes.”
“that’s not what your site says.”
Heh. Err. Whoops! To my Cali friends, I do hope you’ll all vote YES on 2.
As you were.
You’re currently reading “ Errr whoops ,” an entry on uberfrau!
I was wondering why you were voting no on 2 :). Mine vote is already cast…yes on 2. No on 8.
I was sort of wondering, too. Then I went to the LA Time’s OpEd pages and they recommend No on 2 as well. I’m still going to vote “yes” on it though as you might expect. 
XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Hi. Are you really reading this? I kinda doubt it. It’s all about the baby. But you knew that. Well, it used to be all about the contents of my uterus. But I have disgorged myself of the contents of my uterus. Actually, she was forcibly removed on September 25th. So now, we’re following her progress outside the confines of my womb.
There will still be TMI, both about her bodily functions and mine. Don’t like it? Tough luck.
I still don’t think anyone has read this, though…
2 Comments
Jump to comment form | comments rss [?] | trackback uri [?]